Wet and dry sieving are two different approaches to creating solventless cannabis concentrates. Each method has unique advantages and challenges, yet both arrive at the same destination - isolating cannabis resin from the cannabis plant. Depending on the resources at hand and the goal for production, one method of extraction will be better than the other. Let’s explore the basics of each method and weigh the pros and cons to help you decide which is right for you.

What Is Wet Sieving?

Wet sieving, or Ice Water Extraction, involves agitating cannabis flower and trichome-rich trim in ice-cold water. This process, also called washing hash, causes the resinous trichome heads to separate from the plant material and sink to the bottom of the washing vessel. The mixture is then drained from the vessel and passed through a series of sieving screens called bubble wash bags, to filter and collect the trichomes. The resulting trichomes, or loose resin, is called bubble hash.

What Is Dry Sieving?

Dry sieving, or dry sifting, involves gently agitating dried and cured cannabis over a series of fine mesh sieves to separate trichome heads from the plant material. Unlike wet sieving, this process doesn’t require water or ice. However, a cold environment is necessary for dry sifting. The end product, a collection of loose resin, is known as dry sift.

Pros and Cons of Wet Sieving - Ice Water Extraction

Versatility: Bubble hash can be further processed into rosin or consumed directly.

Scalable: Suitable for both small-batch craft operations and larger-scale production.

Cons:

Equipment: Requires specialized equipment, including ice water extraction systems and a drying system. 

Time-Consuming: The process involves several steps, including agitation, sieving, and drying the bubble hash. 

Drying Challenges: The collected resin must be carefully dried to prevent mold or degradation, adding complexity to the process. 

Water Dependency: Ice and clean water are essential, making it less eco-friendly in areas with water scarcity.

Pros and Cons of Dry Sieving (Dry Sifting)

Pros:

Simplicity: Requires minimal equipment, typically just a series of sieves, or sifting screens, making it more accessible to hobbyists and small-scale producers. 

Lower Cost: Minimal setup and operation costs compared to wet sieving. 

Immediate Use: Dry sift doesn’t need a drying step, allowing for quicker turnaround times.

Cons:

Higher Plant Contaminants: It’s harder to produce ultra-clean resin with dry sieving, as plant material can more easily pass through the screens. However, cleaning sift with the static tech method can help.  

Limited Scalability: While simple, it’s less efficient for large-scale operations. 

Terpene Loss: As the cannabis starting material dries in preparation for sifting, terpenes are lost.

Which Method Is Right for You?

Choosing between wet and dry sieving ultimately depends on your goals, resources, and the type of product you want to create.

Dry Sieving is better suited for producers who value simplicity and lower setup costs. It’s also a great entry point for hobbyists or small-scale operations. 

Final Thoughts

Both wet and dry sieving are time-honored methods of solventless cannabis extraction that can produce exceptional products when done correctly. By understanding the pros and cons of each, you can decide which approach will best suit your needs. It’s ideal to have experience doing both, and you can’t go wrong with either method. Both are capable of producing exceptional solventless cannabis concentrates. 

Thoughts? Let us know by joining our secret Facebook group. Hang out with a community of like-minded solventless heads like yourself. Ask our head extractor questions, share your latest press and learn from hobbyists and experts in the industry.